| 
			 The small-scale agreement being negotiated by Senator Patty 
			Murray, a Democrat, and Republican Representative Paul Ryan would 
			lead to less than $100 billion in new savings, aides familiar with 
			the talks said. 
 			The savings would replace some of the cuts that went into effect 
			automatically as part of the budget "sequestration" earlier this 
			year, and would provide a small amount of additional deficit 
			reduction, they said.
 			The deal being negotiated would set spending on discretionary 
			programs ranging from the military to national parks for fiscal 2014 
			and 2015 at around $1 trillion each year. Without action, such 
			spending would be automatically cut to $967 billion in 2014, the 
			lowest level in a decade.
 			Ryan, the chairman of the House of Representatives budget committee 
			and Murray, who chairs the Senate budget committee, are expected to 
			continue their talks on Friday with the aim of a deal that can be 
			passed next week, before the start of a House recess on December 13.
 			"I'm hopeful that next week we can show the people of this country 
			that we can produce something that is smarter than the way we're 
			going about things now," said House Majority Leader Eric Cantor, a 
			Republican. 						
			
			 
 			But any deal's fate in Congress could hinge in part on whether it 
			includes an agreement to extend long-term federal unemployment 
			benefits due to expire later this month for some 1.3 million 
			Americans. President Barack Obama and his Democrats want to extend 
			the benefits to avoid job losses caused by reduced consumer 
			spending, but Republicans question whether the benefits are still 
			needed in an improving economy and are opposed unless it is offset 
			by other savings.
 			Other difficult issues remain including a plan to require federal 
			workers to contribute more to their pensions, which are separate 
			from the Social Security retirement benefits system, and a move to 
			increase airport fees.
 			Both measures could be part of a broader effort to either raise 
			non-tax revenues or cut costs in order to ease some of the automatic 
			spending cuts.
 			"The last few steps are the hardest," a Senate Democratic leadership 
			aide said of the Murray-Ryan negotiations.
 			The $1 trillion top-line spending number, provided by a House 
			Republican aide, would allow Senate and House appropriators to 
			parcel out funding to the various federal agencies for the rest of 
			this fiscal year, which began on October 1, as well as the one that 
			starts on October 1, 2014.
 			
            [to top of second column] | 
            
			 
			BROKEN PROCESS
 			Lawmakers, exhausted from three years of non-stop budget fights 
			which culminated in a 16-day shutdown of many federal agencies in 
			October, hope a deal would bring some sanity to the budget process. 
			The string of budget crises has contributed to historically low 
			public approval ratings of Congress.
 			Among the non-tax revenues considered in the talks is a contribution 
			of around $10 billion from an increase in airport security fees paid 
			by air travelers. Airlines for America, an industry trade group, 
			estimates the Transportation Security Administration fee would 
			double to $5 per ticket if the proposal is adopted, said Jean 
			Medina, a spokeswoman for the group.
 			"We think this is really a wrong-headed move, especially when air 
			travelers are already so heavily taxed," Medina said, adding that 
			the trade group handed out air sickness bags at Reagan National 
			Airport this week as part of a campaign to stop the fee increase.
 			Also unclear was whether any deal would contain a temporary "patch" 
			to prevent a scheduled reduction in payments to doctors treating 
			elderly patients in the Medicare program, a fix that tends to arise 
			every year.
 			If Ryan and Murray do reach a deal, it could draw opposition from 
			liberal Democrats, who do not support subjecting federal workers to 
			additional budget savings, as well as from conservative Republicans, 
			who will not get the long-term cuts to Medicare, Medicaid and Social 
			Security programs that they have been seeking.
 			(Additional reporting by Steve Holland and Thomas Ferraro; 
editing 
			by Vicki Allen, Cynthia Osterman and Paul Simao) 			
			
			 |