| 
			 On a voice vote, the Democratic-led Senate passed the bill, which 
			would extend for 10 years the Undetectable Firearms Act of 1988. 
 			The Republican-led House of Representatives approved the bill last 
			week and, like the Senate, refused to pass tougher provisions 
			opposed by the powerful gun industry.
 			President Barack Obama signed the legislation into law before the 
			ban was to expire at midnight.
 			Along with many fellow Democrats, Obama would prefer an updated 
			version of the ban to close what are seen as loopholes created by 
			new technologies, such as 3-D printing, an aide said.
 			Senate Democrats led by Charles Schumer of New York failed on Monday 
			to win quick approval of a measure to require all firearms to 
			include at least 3.7 ounces of non-removable metal essential for its 
			operation.
 			Without the provision, backers argue, the metal could be taken off 
			the gun, permitting a functional weapon to pass undetected through 
			metal detectors and X-ray machines and carried into supposedly 
			secure areas. 			
			
			 
 			Senate Republicans refused to provide the unanimous consent needed 
			to approve the change on a legislative fast-track.
 			Democrats then joined Republicans in voting to extend ban, but 
			promised to keep pushing for tougher provisions. A key Republican 
			said he was ready to listen.
 			Senator Charles Grassley of Iowa, top Republican on the Judiciary 
			Committee, said changes may be needed in the ban, but complained 
			that Schumer sought a vote before many lawmakers understood his 
			provision and what it sought to fix.
 			"Congress needs to gain an understanding of printed gun 
			manufacturing technology and its relation to permanent metal parts," 
			Grassley said, adding that hearings are needed.
 			Schumer said he was encouraged by Grassley's comments, telling 
			reporters, "I'm hopeful that we can come to a compromise."
 			Schumer, who has often tangled with the gun industry on his efforts 
			to toughen gun laws, said the industry has been relatively low key 
			on this issue, and added that he hopes it stays that way.
 			
            [to top of second column] | 
            
			 
			The ban was first signed into law in 1988 by Republican President 
			Ronald Reagan shortly after the introduction of the Austrian-made 
			Glock firearm. Made largely of synthetic material, the Glock created 
			a fear of undetectable weapons.
 			That increased with the proliferation of the underground production 
			of plastic guns with 3-D printers.
 			Democratic Senator Chris Murphy of Connecticut called for an update 
			of the law, saying, "This isn't science fiction anymore .... Someone 
			can make a gun in their basement."
 			The gun industry favored extension of the ban, but opposed expanding 
			it, saying the proposed modernization of the law would violate the 
			right to bear arms and unnecessarily interfere with the legal 
			production of firearms.
 			Earlier this year, the gun industry used its political clout to help 
			defeat Obama's bid to toughen gun laws in wake of a massacre at an 
			elementary school in Newtown, Connecticut.
 			The Center for American Progress, a liberal advocacy group, called 
			it "crucial" to extend the ban, but denounced the measure passed by 
			Congress as "deeply flawed."
 			"It does nothing to address new technologies like 3-D printing that 
			could allow terrorists and other dangerous people to easily make 
			fully functional, undetectable guns," said Winnie Stachelberg, an 
			executive vice president at the center. 			
			
			 
 			(Reporting by Thomas Ferraro; additional reporting by Richard Cowan, 
			David Ingram and Jeff Mason; editing by Bill Trott and Jackie Frank) 
			[© 2013 Thomson Reuters. All rights 
				reserved.] Copyright 2013 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, 
			broadcast, rewritten or redistributed. |