| 
			 The full Senate was unable to consider some 500 proposed 
			amendments in time to pass the bill this month, so the committees' 
			Democratic and Republican leaders hammered out a compromise on 
			pressing issues such as strengthening protections for victims of 
			sexual assault in the military and keeping open the military prison 
			at Guantanamo Bay in Cuba. 
 			"This is not the best way to proceed, but our troops and their 
			families and our nation's security deserve a defense bill, and this 
			is the only practical way to get a defense bill done," said 
			Democratic Senator Carl Levin, chairman of the Senate Armed Services 
			panel, said on the Senate floor.
 			The defense panel leaders want the House to vote on the measure 
			before it leaves for its year-end holiday recess on Friday and a 
			final vote in the Senate next week.
 			The compromise bill authorizes $552.1 billion in spending for 
			national defense and an additional $80.7 billion for foreign 
			military operations, including in Afghanistan. The base budget is 
			unchanged from the 2013 bill, but war spending is $7.8 billion 
			lower.
 			It would be the third time in five years that Congress has resorted 
			to passing a slimmed-down defense policy bill, after similar 
			compromises in 2008 and 2010. 			
			
			 
 			The bill does not include an amendment seeking to overhaul the way 
			the Pentagon handles sexual assault complaints that was proposed by 
			New York Democratic Senator Kirsten Gillibrand.
 			The Gillibrand measure would place decisions about whether to 
			prosecute sex crimes in the hands of professional military 
			prosecutors and remove it from victims' commanders. It is opposed by 
			most Pentagon leaders, but has attracted fairly wide support among 
			lawmakers.
 			The New York Democrat has pledged to bring her legislation up as a 
			standalone bill.
 			The measure also would leave open the detention center at Guantanamo 
			Bay in Cuba, where 164 terrorism suspects have been held for as long 
			as 12 years without charge.
 			However, it would loosen restrictions on President Barack Obama's 
			ability to send prisoners from Guantanamo to other countries, while 
			continuing to forbid their transfer to the United States, something 
			adamantly opposed by Republican lawmakers in particular.
 			Obama has pledged to close the prison at the Navy base.
 			OVERCOMING GRIDLOCK?
 			Congress has managed to pass a National Defense Authorization Act 
			authorizing spending for the military every year for 52 years, in a 
			rare exception to the partisan gridlock that has stalled most other 
			legislation.
 			This year's bill was passed by the House months ago, but was stalled 
			in the Senate as Democrats and Republicans argued over amendments. 
			Some Senate Republicans said on Monday they were angry that the 
			measure had come to the floor only last month, allowing too little 
			time to debate amendments.
 			
            [to top of second column] | 
            
			 
			Levin and James Inhofe, the top Republican on the Senate committee, 
			both said a version of the bill must pass Congress this month rather 
			than when the House and Senate return from their holiday breaks in 
			January.
 			They distributed a letter from General Martin Dempsey, chairman of 
			the Joint Chiefs of Staff, in which the top U.S. military commander 
			listed nearly two dozen expiring spending authorities and said 
			allowing the bill to be delayed until January would affect the 
			Pentagon's global influence.
 			Among other things, failure to pass the measure could interrupt the 
			pay of troops who are now in combat and disrupt some expensive 
			projects, at a huge cost to taxpayers.
 			"We'd be wasting not millions but billions of dollars if we don't do 
			this," Inhofe told a news conference after he and Levin presented 
			the compromise bill in the Senate.
 			The bill requires additional oversight of two of the Pentagon's 
			biggest acquisition programs — the $392 billion F-35 Joint Strike 
			Fighter being built by Lockheed Martin Corp and the 52-ship Littoral 
			Combat Ship program, which includes ships built by Lockheed and 
			Australia' Austal.
 			It called for an independent assessment of software being developed 
			for the F-35 fighter jet, and its complex computer-based logistic 
			system, as well as development of a plan for operations and 
			maintenance of the new coastal warships.
 			It was not immediately clear whether the bill would hit the House 
			and Senate floors in time to pass this year, but its bipartisan 
			support increased the chances it would be approved.
 			Representative Buck McKeon, the Republican chairman of the House 
			Armed Service Committee, said he had spoken to House leaders about 
			the measure but had not received an answer by Monday evening on 
			whether they would allow a vote.
 			Levin said he was meeting with Senate Democrats, and Inhofe said he 
			could not yet say how Senate Republicans would choose to proceed.
 			"We're going to try to do our best to get it passed," Inhofe said. 			
			
			 
 			(Additional reporting by Andrea Shala-Esa; 
editing by Christopher 
			Wilson, Jackie Frank and Lisa Shumaker) 
			[© 2013 Thomson Reuters. All rights 
				reserved.] Copyright 2013 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, 
			broadcast, rewritten or redistributed. |