| 
			 A year later, the impact of the law remains up for debate. 
 			Conservatives say it has already made Michigan more attractive to 
			businesses, but it could take years before the economic benefits can 
			be measured. Unions and Democratic opponents are pronouncing it a 
			failure because unemployment has gone up. And in the gubernatorial 
			race, it does not seem to be a central issue — at least not yet.
 			Michigan's right-to-work law, which bans making union membership a 
			condition of employment, is similar to those already in effect in 23 
			other states. Except for Indiana, which also passed a right-to-work 
			law last year, laws in the other states have been in effect for 
			years. Michigan stands apart because it is home to the United Auto 
			Workers, the center of the U.S. auto industry, and a swing state in 
			national elections, where worker rights can become polarizing 
			issues.
 			"Right-to-work has done none of the things its backers promised," 
			said Bill Black, Michigan state legal and political director for the 
			Teamsters union. "It has not brought better jobs and it has not 
			helped the people of Michigan."
 			But people outside the state are taking a different view. Tracy 
			Bosman, a Chicago-based site selection consultant with Biggins Lacy 
			Shapiro & Co, says Michigan's law has generated interest in the 
			state. 			
			 
 			Up to 50 percent of manufacturers automatically screen out any 
			non-right-to-work state, Bosman said, so Michigan was out of the 
			picture for many companies looking to add production capacity.
 			"While it does not guarantee success for Michigan, it does at least 
			mean the state will get a second look from firms that automatically 
			excluded it in the past," she said.
 			Union leaders say the Michigan law has not hit membership numbers 
			since it took effect in March. Unions have sought to persuade the 
			rank-and-file that membership has value, with targeted marketing 
			that included meeting with members statewide.
 			"The workers here understand very clearly that right to work means 
			the right to work for less," said the Teamsters' Black. He explained 
			that fewer than 100 of the 50,000 workers it represents here have 
			opted out.
 			Department of Labor figures showing union membership in Michigan for 
			2013 will not be available until January, and the state itself does 
			not collect such data.
 			Federal data show Michigan's union membership is well above the 
			national average of 11.3 percent of the workforce. The 2012 data 
			showed union members made up 16.6 percent of the workforce — down 
			from 17.5 percent in 2011, and a significant drop from 21.9 percent 
			in 2003.
 			Republicans argue the apparently limited effect of the law on union 
			membership supports their argument that it is about "worker choice." 
			And they claim unions have tried to limit choice with tactics 
			designed to make it difficult for workers to opt out of membership.
 			Doug Pratt, director of member benefits at the Michigan Education 
			Association, disagreed, saying unions have used no underhanded 
			methods to prevent members from leaving. Through "relentless hard 
			work," the MEA has lost only 1,500 of the 110,000 members, he said.
 			Chandra Madafferi, 39, has been a teacher for 16 years and 
			identifies herself as politically conservative. She said she has 
			stayed with the MEA because she feels the right-to-work law was part 
			of an attack on public education and the middle class.
 			"Being part of a union is the only way we can collectively fight 
			against these laws that are hurting us," she said. 			
			 
 			Union representatives like Steve Kreisberg, national collective 
			bargaining director of the American Federation of State, County & 
			Municipal Employees, the largest U.S. public sector union, still 
			worry about the law's long-term impact.
 			Workers continue to get union representation even if they stop 
			paying dues, so unions have to persuade people to keep contributing 
			to their cause.
 			"Frankly, we're in uncharted territory," Kreisberg said.
 			
            [to top of second column] | 
            
			 
			STIRRINGS, BUT NO PROOF
 			Any immediate effect on Michigan's unemployment rate is difficult to 
			gauge. When the state passed its law last December, Governor Snyder 
			said it would help attract businesses "so our families can enjoy 
			more and better jobs."
 			But Michigan's unemployment rate actually ticked up a fraction, to 9 
			percent in October from 8.9 percent last December. The national rate 
			fell 7 percent during that time, from 7.8 percent when the law was 
			passed.
 			The Michigan Economic Development Corporation, a state-funded group, 
			said new business investment has jumped during the same time period, 
			up 33 percent in 12 months since the law passed, to around $1.6 
			billion. The announced investments would create 9,400 jobs, up from 
			around 6,700 in the year before passage. Many of the investments in 
			the past year were in the automotive sector and involved expanding 
			existing manufacturing capacity.
 			Warnings that wages would collapse have not panned out so far. 
			Manufacturing wages were down about 2 percent in October compared 
			with December 2012, but overall private sector wages rose about 2 
			percent.
 			Governor Snyder said he has seen a growing interest in Michigan from 
			site selection consultants. Passing the law "has created an 
			environment where we're very competitive," he said.
 			Michigan Economic Development Corporation chief executive Michael 
			Finney said the state has also benefited from a reduction in the 
			corporate income tax, reduced regulation, and improved fiscal 
			discipline by state government.
 			Even so, supporters of the law acknowledge there is little data to 
			make a case that it is generating economic activity. 			
			
			 
 			"There is no way to empirically measure the economic impact of 
			right-to-work because the data is not available," said Michael 
			LaFaive, a director of fiscal policy at the Mackinac Center, a 
			conservative think tank. "It will take a good 10 years of data to do 
			that."
 			Gretchen Whitmer, leader of the Democratic state Senate minority, 
			said supporters are grasping at straws.
 			"What are they going to say after 10 years have passed?" she asked. 
			"That we need another 10, another 20?"
 			POLITICS HEATING UP
 			The law's effect on Michigan's politics is difficult to measure as 
			well. Governor Snyder will be going up against relatively unknown 
			former Democratic congressman Mark Schauer, yet a November poll from 
			non-partisan Inside Michigan Politics had them statistically tied.
 			Inside Michigan Politics publisher Susan Demas said a tax on 
			pensions has been a bigger problem for Snyder than the right-to-work 
			law. The tax has weakened Snyder's standing more among retirees, who 
			are usually seen as part of the Republican base, she said.
 			Cuts to education and a corporate income tax reduction may also 
			overshadow right-to-work during the campaign, Demas said.
 			Union representatives acknowledge that the law, so far, is not 
			emerging as a wedge issue.
 			"There's probably only a subset of people angry over right to work," 
			said the MEA's Pratt. "But what has people really angry is this 
			administration's favoring special interests and not what's best for 
			the people of this state. That's what will determine the outcome of 
			next year's election."
 			(Reporting by Nick Carey; editing by David Greising and Gunna 
			Dickson) 
			[© 2013 Thomson Reuters. All rights 
				reserved.] Copyright 2013 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, 
			broadcast, rewritten or redistributed. |