| 
			 The panel gave the most populous U.S. state until mid-January to 
			reach a negotiated plan with lawyers representing inmates over poor 
			medical care and crowded conditions. It also extended a deadline by 
			about two months to April 18 to otherwise reduce crowding if no deal 
			is reached. 
 			California prisons have been in the national spotlight for the past 
			year as officials wrestled with crowding and concerns about the 
			state's use of long-term solitary confinement for prisoners with 
			suspected gang ties, which led to a hunger strike this year.
 			The state has been under court orders to reduce inmate numbers since 
			2009, when the same panel ordered it to relieve overcrowding that 
			several courts, including the U.S. Supreme Court, have said was to 
			blame for inadequate medical and mental-health care. 			
			
			 
 			As recently as 2006, the state's prisons held twice as many 
			prisoners as they were meant to house, and inmate bunks were stacked 
			in gymnasiums and day rooms along with regular cells. The 34 prisons 
			in question, with about 120,000 inmates altogether, are now at about 
			150 percent of capacity.
 			California Governor Jerry Brown has repeatedly said he believes that 
			the state has fixed its problem. The state has reduced crowding, 
			though not to the degree required by the court, by shifting 
			oversight for some inmates to the counties, reopening a shuttered 
			facility and transferring some inmates to private facilities. It has 
			also improved medical services.
 			But the court has ordered the state to reduce the population 
			further.
 			The judges in June ordered Brown to reduce the state prison 
			population to 137.5 percent of capacity, even if that meant 
			releasing some inmates early. The judges threatened to hold him in 
			contempt of court if the state failed to comply.
 			
            [to top of second column] | 
            
			 
			The U.S. Supreme Court, which upheld the original overcrowding 
			ruling in 2011, earlier this year refused to hear an appeal by Brown 
			of the panel's June order.
 			The state countered by offering to spend more money on 
			anti-recidivism programs, such as mental health care and education 
			for inmates, and the judges agreed to a short extension to see if 
			officials could agree on a plan with lawyers representing inmates.
 			Brown's office welcomed Wednesday's decision to extend those talks, 
			with spokeswoman Deborah Hoffman calling it "encouraging."
 			A lawyer representing the inmates said he did not believe 
			overcrowding could be solved simply by providing more services to 
			inmates. He said the state should implement the anti-recidivism 
			programs while also moving to reduce crowding, including by allowing 
			more inmates to earn early release through good behavior.
 			"I am not comfortable with a long extension," attorney Michael Bien 
			said. "There has got to be something done and soon."
 			(Reporting by Sharon Bernstein; editing by Cynthia Johnston, Steve Orlofsky and David Brunnstrom) 
			[© 2013 Thomson Reuters. All rights 
				reserved.] Copyright 2013 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, 
			broadcast, rewritten or redistributed. 
			
			 |