| 
			 The company, Blue Origin, had filed a protest with the U.S. 
			General Accountability Office, which arbitrates federal contract 
			disputes. The GAO said in a decision it denied the company's 
			protest. 
 			Blue Origin is vying against another company owned by Elon Musk, 
			co-founder of PayPal and chief executive of electric car company 
			Tesla Motors, to lease Launch Pad 39A at the Kennedy Space Center.
 			Musk's company, Space Exploration Technologies, or SpaceX, already 
			flies rockets from a leased launch pad at Cape Canaveral Air Force 
			Station, just south of NASA's spaceport.
 			Blue Origin and SpaceX submitted proposals to NASA to take over 
			maintenance and operations of Launch Pad 39A so it could be 
			developed for commercial use.
 			Before NASA selected a winner, Blue Origin filed a protest, claiming 
			its proposal to develop a multi-user facility better fit NASA's 
			declared intention for the pad. 			
			
			 
 			SpaceX, which launches its Falcon 9 rockets from nearby Cape 
			Canaveral Air Force Station, wants to use the pad as a second 
			Florida base.
 			Musk told Reuters after the protest was filed that he had no problem 
			if other companies use the launch pad if SpaceX was awarded a 
			five-year lease.
 			"I think it's kind of moot whether or not SpaceX gets exclusive or 
			non-exclusive rights for the next five years. I don't see anyone 
			else using that pad for the next five years," Musk told Reuters in 
			September. "I think it's a bit silly because Blue Origin hasn't 
			even done a suborbital flight to space, let alone an orbital one. If 
			one were to extrapolate their progress, they might reach orbit in 
			five years, but that seems unlikely," he said.
 			
            [to top of second column] | 
            
			 
			Blue Origin contended the NASA solicitation "provided for a 
			preference in favor of a multi-user (as opposed to an exclusive use) 
			approach to utilizing the launch pad," the GAO said in its ruling on 
			Thursday.
 			"NASA took the position that neither approach was favored," the 
			ruling said.
 			"GAO agreed with NASA, and in its decision concluded that there was 
			no preference for either approach," the GAO added.
 			NASA had hoped to turn over pad operations to a commercial user by 
			October 1, 2013. The delay is costing NASA about $100,000 per month, 
			agency officials said.
 			SpaceX said it had no comment on the GAO ruling. Blue Origin 
			officials did not immediately reply to a request for comment.
 			(Editing by Kevin Gray and Cynthia Osterman) 
			[© 2013 Thomson Reuters. All rights 
				reserved.] Copyright 2013 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, 
			broadcast, rewritten or redistributed. 
			
			
			 |