| 
			 Former NSA contractor Snowden's disclosures have been 
			"cataclysmic" for the eavesdropping agency, Richard Ledgett, who 
			leads a task force responding to the leaks, said in a rare interview 
			at NSA's heavily guarded Fort Meade headquarters. 
 			In the more than hour-long interview, Ledgett acknowledged the 
			agency had done a poor job in its initial public response to 
			revelations of vast NSA monitoring of phone and Internet data; 
			pledged more transparency; and said he was deeply worried about 
			highly classified documents not yet public that are among the 1.7 
			million Snowden is believed to have accessed.
 			He also stoutly defended the NSA's mission of tracking terrorist 
			plots and other threats, and said its recruiting of young 
			codebreakers, linguists and computer geeks has not been affected by 
			the Snowden affair — even as internal morale has been.
 			"Any time you trust people, there is always a chance that someone 
			will betray you," he said. 			
			
			 
 			The NSA is taking 41 specific technical measures to control data by 
			tagging and tracking it, to supervise agency networks with controls 
			on activity, and to increase oversight of individuals.
 			Measures include requiring two-person control of every place where 
			someone could access data and enhancing the security process that 
			people go through and requiring more frequent screenings of systems 
			administrative access, Ledgett said.
 			After months of sometimes blistering criticism in the news media and 
			by Congress and foreign governments, the publicity-averse NSA is now 
			mounting an effort to tell its side of the Snowden story.
 			It granted access to NSA headquarters to a team from CBS' "60 
			Minutes" program, which is scheduled to broadcast a segment on the 
			agency on Sunday.
 			Ledgett, a 36-year intelligence veteran who reportedly is in line to 
			be the agency's deputy director, joked that doing media interviews 
			was "a complete out-of-body experience for me."
 			He spoke to Reuters on the same day that the White House said it had 
			decided to maintain the practice of having a single individual head 
			both the NSA and U.S. Cyber Command, which conducts cyberwarfare — an outcome the NSA leadership favored.
 			Separately, news reports late Thursday said an outside review panel 
			appointed by the White House has recommended changes in a program 
			disclosed by Snowden that collects basic data on Americans' phone 
			calls — known as metadata.
 			The panel reportedly said the data should be held by an organization 
			other than the NSA and stricter rules should be enforced for 
			searching the databanks.
 			Ledgett declined to discuss the panel's specific recommendations. 
			But he seemed to acknowledge that tighter guidelines for NSA 
			eavesdropping were in the offing, saying that what is 
			technologically possible "has gotten ahead of policy."
 			Snowden, who is living under asylum in Russia, disclosed a vast U.S. 
			eavesdropping apparatus that includes the phone metadata program; 
			NSA querying of Internet communications via major companies such as 
			Google Inc and Facebook Inc; and widespread tapping of international 
			communication networks.
 			Ledgett made no apologies for what many see as overly aggressive NSA 
			monitoring. He noted that the U.S. government's intelligence 
			taskings to the agency run to 36,000 pages, and said its activities 
			take place within a "box" of U.S. laws and policies.
 			
            [to top of second column] | 
            
			 
			"We'll color in every square millimeter of that box," he said, 
			implying the NSA will use its legal authorities to the fullest 
			extent possible.
 			The NSA's internal review has determined about 98 percent of the 
			scope of the material that Snowden had accessed, and officials have 
			found no evidence that he had help either within the NSA or from 
			adversary spy agencies.
 			Ledgett said that when Snowden was downloading the documents, NSA 
			was ahead of other intelligence agencies in installing "insider 
			threat" software that President Barack Obama ordered in the wake of 
			an earlier leak scandal involving the group WikiLeaks. But 
			installation of the software, which might have stopped Snowden, was 
			not complete.
 			"Snowden hit at a really opportune time. For him — not for us," he 
			said.
 			Ledgett said that most of the Snowden material released publicly so 
			far has been about NSA programs and partnerships with foreign 
			countries and companies, rather than intelligence reports and 
			"requirements." The latter refers to U.S. government taskings to the 
			NSA to answer questions about specific targets.
 			That last category is what keeps him up at night. "Those make me 
			nervous because they reveal what we know and what we don't know and 
			they are almost a roadmap for adversaries."
 			No one at the NSA has yet lost their job over the Snowden crisis, 
			including at the Hawaii site where he worked. Ledgett said three 
			people are under review for potential disciplinary action, but 
			declined further comment.
 			He challenged those who call Snowden a whistleblower, saying the 
			former contractor did not use multiple channels available to vent 
			his concerns. "I actually think characterizing him as a 
			whistleblower is a disservice to people who are whistleblowers."
 			Ledgett said he knew of no U.S. government move toward reaching any 
			kind of a legal deal with Snowden, a decision that would be up to 
			the Justice Department.
 			But, he said in his opinion, such a conversation would have to 
			include concrete assurances that Snowden would secure any of the 
			material he has that has not yet been made public. 						
			
			 
 			In the aftermath of Snowden, the NSA is trying to be more open about 
			what it does so the public can have more confidence in the agency's 
			mission.
 			"We as an agency are a little naive, for a long time we were 'No 
			Such Agency' or 'no comment' and were not adept at presenting our 
			face to the public," he said.
 			"I think quite frankly had we done more of that over the last five 
			or 10 years we might not be in the same place that we are vis-a-vis 
			the public perception of who we are and what we do," he said. "So 
			too late to learn that lesson, so what you are seeing now is our new 
			face."
 			(Editing by Lisa Shumaker) 
			[© 2013 Thomson Reuters. All rights 
				reserved.] Copyright 2013 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, 
			broadcast, rewritten or redistributed. |