| 
            
			 The proposal, prepared by Lithuania which holds the rotating 
			presidency of the European Union, will be discussed at an 
			extraordinary meeting of senior EU officials in Brussels on Monday. 
 			Separately, several European finance ministers and senior EU 
			officials will meet again in Berlin on Monday to try to make further 
			headway on a compromise for rules to wind down stricken banks, 
			senior euro zone sources told Reuters on Sunday.
 			The meeting will, in essence, include the same group of finance 
			ministers and senior officials who met in Berlin on Dec. 6, the 
			sources said.
 			After a financial storm that toppled banks and dragged down states 
			from Ireland to Spain, countries are considering a fresh blueprint 
			outlining what to do when a bank fails, a critical second pillar of 
			a wider reform dubbed "banking union".
 			Sealing a deal ahead of an EU summit in Brussels December 19-20 will 
			allow Germany's Chancellor Angela Merkel and her peers to trumpet an 
			important overhaul of banking, although their readiness to share the 
			costs of failed lenders, a central tenet of banking union, may fall 
			short of what had been hoped. 			
 
 			Under the proposal, the costs of closing down a bank in the first 
			year of operation would be fully covered by a fund set up by the 
			home country where the bank resides.
 			Such funds would be set up in every euro zone country and each would 
			be filled from fees paid in by banks in the respective countries, 
			amounting each year to 0.1 percent of all covered deposits they 
			hold.
 			Such funds would reach their full size of 1 percent of all covered 
			deposits after 10 years, but in the first year each would have only 
			0.1 percent of all covered deposits in a euro zone country, then 0.2 
			percent in the second, and so on.
 			If the accumulated money from bank fees in a home country in the 
			first year is insufficient to finance the closure of a bank, other 
			funds in euro zone countries would be expected to contribute up to 
			10 percent of their accumulated money to help.
 			In the second year, the home fund would only be obliged to use up 90 
			percent of its accumulated funds to finance the cost of closing down 
			a bank before it could call on its euro zone partners, who would be 
			required to chip in with up to 20 percent of what they hold to help.
 			The obligation for the home country before it could call on partners 
			would decrease by 10 percent each year and the potential obligation 
			for other euro zone countries would rise by 10 percent.
 			
            [to top of second column] | 
 
			In this way, by the tenth year, the home country fund would only 
			have to contribute 10 percent of their funds before calling on its 
			euro zone partners who, like the home country, would be obliged to 
			contribute whatever was required — up to 100 pct of their total 
			funds — to pay for the bank closure. If the cost of closing down a bank in any of the 10 transition 
			years turns out to be bigger than the combined home country 
			contribution and the proportionate percentage help of other funds, 
			the home country fund could impose an additional levy on its own 
			banking sector.
 			If that were still insufficient, the government of the country in 
			which the bank is located could provide bridge financing, to be 
			repaid from bank fees later, or if it does not have the cash, it 
			could ask for a program from the euro zone bailout fund ESM, like 
			Spain did in 2012.
 			All the national funds for closing down banks would be merged into 
			one Single Resolution Fund for the euro zone after 10 years and from 
			that moment the Single Resolution Fund would finance all bank 
			closures, fully mutualising risk.
 			Setting up the Single Resolution Fund and the complex risk and cost 
			sharing arrangement over the 10 transition years is to be enshrined 
			in an intergovernmental treaty, which is to be negotiated by euro 
zone countries by March 1, 2014, the Lithuanian proposal said.
 			The use of Single Resolution Fund would be decided by the Board of 
			the Single Resolution Authority, made of up representatives of euro 
zone countries and institutions.
 			The Board would vote by qualified majority, rather than unanimity, 
			the Lithuanian proposal said.
 			(Editing by Sonya Hepinstall) 
			[© 2013 Thomson Reuters. All rights 
				reserved.] Copyright 2013 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, 
			broadcast, rewritten or redistributed. 
			
			 |