| 
            
			 Authorities have decided to lift a ban on new stock listings from as 
			early as next month, wagering that a series of confidence-building 
			measures announced recently will ensure healthy demand for the tide 
			of new shares expected in 2014. 
 			But if they are wrong, a flood of new listings could not only sink 
			China's already-struggling bourses but also jeopardize a bigger 
			reform goal: to ensure more money flows to where it is needed in the 
			world's second-largest economy.
 			Early signs are not encouraging.
 			Chinese investors appear far from persuaded that their stock markets 
			are on the threshold of a transformation into investment 
			destinations that are worthy alternatives to bank deposits, property 
			and other preferred homes for their long-term savings.
 			"We stock investors are all idiots! Idiots!" said a middle-aged man, 
			who gave his surname as Li, speaking in a retail stock-trading room 
			at a brokerage in downtown Shanghai.
 			"Why do we buy these things? The U.S. market is at an all-time high 
			and the Chinese markets are down. When the U.S. market dives, we 
			dive even further. As for the impact of the resumption of IPOs, my 
			attitude is extremely pessimistic." 			
 
 			Though a market cannot thrive for long without new listings, China's 
			freeze helped trigger a strong rally in early 2013 by choking the 
			supply of new paper. The CSI300 index, made up of 300 stocks on the 
			Shanghai and Shenzhen exchanges, gained over 30 percent in the first 
			two months after the freeze.
 			The index has held onto some of its gains — it is now up 12 percent 
			since the IPO ban — but its rally cannot disguise the fact that 
			China's stock markets remain among the world's worst-performing 
			bourses over the past two years.
 			With more than 800 new companies queued to tap the market — and 
			with Ernst & Young estimating that 200 billion yuan ($33 billion) 
			will be raised in 2014 — there are concerns investors will simply 
			sell shares in existing firms to fund their IPO purchases, a 
			zero-sum scenario for the overall market.
 			"I think in the short term the IPO resumption is negative — in 
			terms of sentiment at least — and also you will see some capital 
			drain because of the new listings," said Richard Gao, lead portfolio 
			manager at Matthews China Fund <MCHFX.O>.
 			Gao, though, believes a resumption of IPOs is essential to underpin 
			confidence in the market in the longer term.
 			BUILDING CONFIDENCE
 			To build confidence ahead of the IPO resumption, authorities have 
			announced plans to improve corporate disclosure, crack down on 
			insider trading, hurry defunct stocks off the boards and vet IPOs to 
			prevent newly listed "junk stocks" from replacing them.
 			China's securities watchdog has also moved to rid the IPO market of 
			its shooting stars — stocks that shine brightly on debut before 
			dying out a few months later and trading below their issue price.
 			The China Securities Regulatory Commission has ruled that 
			controlling stakeholders cannot sell their stock within two years of 
			an IPO, a lockup that will be extended if it is trading below its 
			issue price at the end of that two-year period. If firms make 
			misleading statements during an IPO, their owners and underwriters 
			may be forced to buy back shares.
 			However, brokerages complain that domestic retail investors, who 
			account for most brokerage accounts and transaction volumes, remain 
			sour on equities despite Beijing's recent blandishments. 			
 
 			
            [to top of second column] | 
 
            The number of active brokerage trading accounts fell nearly 6 
			percent between January 1 and December 6. Worse, many accounts are 
			inactive: exchange data shows 85 percent of open accounts conducted 
			no trades in November, on par with previous months. 
            In theory, there is plenty of money to fund IPOs without triggering 
			a sell-off of existing stocks: China had over 43 trillion yuan 
			($7.08 trillion) in personal savings deposits in October, according 
			to central bank data, or roughly three times the total free-float 
			capitalization of the Shanghai exchange and seven times that of the 
			Shenzhen exchange.
 			The average Chinese household kept 57.7 percent of their money in 
			the bank in 2011, 18 percent in physical cash and just 15.5 percent 
			in stocks, according to a study by Chengdu's Southwestern University 
			of Finance and Economics. 
            'INVESTORS AREN'T STUPID'
 Not everyone subscribes to the scenario that resumption of IPOs will 
			send Chinese markets lower and there is little question that new 
			issues will attract investor attention, even if much of it continues 
			to come from speculative day traders.
 
 			But even if markets hold up to the tide of IPOs, regulators still 
			face a challenge to persuade long-term investors to accept volatile, 
			short-term price movements in the belief that stock markets will 
			deliver superior returns over the long run.
 			So far in China, this thesis has not held up.
 			Stock market returns have underperformed nearly every other form of 
			investment and failed to track economic growth.
 			Other asset classes such as housing and high-yielding wealth 
			management products have wildly outperformed stocks. According to 
			the study by the Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, 
			the mean return on investment for Chinese families on their first 
			apartment was 340 percent in nominal terms. 			
			
			 
 			Chinese indexes, on the other hand, peaked in October 2007 and have 
			never fully recovered, with the CSI300 index still down nearly 60 
			percent since that time.
 			There has never been anything close to that sort of sustained 
			correction in the housing market, and many believe Beijing can never 
			allow one for political reasons. Similarly, many investors believe 
			wealth management products, with returns of up to 25 percent, are 
			also tacitly guaranteed by the state.
 			"Ordinary Chinese investors aren't stupid. They'll go where the best 
			returns are," said Chen Xin, professor and stock specialist at 
			Jiaotong University's Antai School of Management in Shanghai.
 			"Thing is, they think there's risk in stocks, but they don't realize 
			there's even more risk in other asset classes." ($1 = 6.0718 Chinese 
			yuan) 
			 
            (Additional reporting by David Lin and 
			the Shanghai Newsroom; editing by Mark Bendeich) 
			[© 2013 Thomson Reuters. All rights 
				reserved.] Copyright 2013 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, 
			broadcast, rewritten or redistributed. |