| 
            Study recommends extending juvenile court jurisdiction to include 
			17-year-olds charged with felony offenses 
			Recommendation: To promote a juvenile justice system focused on 
			public safety, youth rehabilitation, fairness and fiscal 
			responsibility, Illinois should immediately adopt legislation 
			expanding the age of juvenile court jurisdiction to include 
			17-year-olds charged with felonies.  Send a link to a friend
 
			
            
            [February 27, 2013] 
            SPRINGFIELD -- After examining 
			the effects of a 2010 state law that places 17-year-olds in juvenile 
			courts for misdemeanor charges but in adult criminal court for 
			felony charges, the Illinois Juvenile Justice Commission has issued 
			a report recommending an end to the practice in the interest of 
			fairness and public safety.  | 
		
            |  "The number of states that 
			routinely treat 17-year-olds as adults is dwindling, since states 
			are trending toward making 18 the default age of adult criminal 
			responsibility," according to the commission report issued Tuesday. 
			"Only 11 other states use an age under 18 as the default age of 
			adulthood for criminal charges. The age of majority for federal 
			prosecutions, like many other federal programs, is also 18." Under 
			the commission's recommendations, 17-year-olds would remain eligible 
			for transfer to adult court for specific serious offenses as 
			detailed in the state's transfer laws.  "A legislative compromise led to the decision of the General 
			Assembly to put 17-year-olds with misdemeanor charges in the 
			juvenile system and those with felony charges in the adult criminal 
			court," said George W. Timberlake, who is chair of the Illinois 
			Juvenile Justice Commission and retired chief judge of the 2nd 
			Judicial Circuit. "Before the law changed in 2010, anyone over the 
			age of 16 was subject to the adult system, which is far less 
			rehabilitative and carries an adult criminal record. The compromise 
			was better than leaving all 17-year-olds in the adult system, and 
			now that the research demonstrates the system can manage the 
			addition of 17-year-olds charged with felonies, it's time to 
			complete the reform." 
			
			 When the compromise was debated, some expressed concerns about 
			the effects of moving all 17-year-old misdemeanants into the 
			juvenile system, and the legislation directed that a study be done 
			of the switch, with recommendations to be made regarding moving all 
			17-year-olds into the juvenile justice system. The commission's study concluded that "none of the predicted 
			negative consequences on the juvenile court system have occurred" 
			due to the inclusion of 17-year-old misdemeanants in the juvenile 
			justice system. The findings include the following: 
				
				Due to a sharp 
				decline in juvenile crime, there are currently fewer juvenile 
				arrests after including 17-year-old misdemeanants than when the 
				General Assembly began debating the change in 2008.
				County juvenile 
				detention centers and state juvenile incarceration facilities 
				were not overrun, as some had feared. Instead, one detention 
				center and two state incarceration facilities have been closed, 
				and excess capacity is still the statewide norm.  
			[to top of second column] | 
 
			 
				
				Multiple federal 
				juvenile policy briefs have now offered new insight into the 
				potential for adolescent offenders to grow and change -- and 
				have warned of serious negative public safety consequences of 
				sending minors through an adult criminal system.
				Instead of drawing a wise, safe or 
				clear distinction between minor and serious offenses, the law 
				splitting 17-year-olds between two court systems caused 
				confusion, and jurisdictional questions still regularly arise 
				when 17-year-olds are arrested.  A new federal law introduced another reason for placing all 
			17-year-olds in the juvenile system. The commission report also 
			warned that the new federal Prison Rape Elimination Act requires all 
			offenders under 18, even those in the criminal system, to be housed 
			separately from adults in all lockups, jails, detention centers and 
			prisons. Noncompliance can result in a 5 percent penalty on several 
			federal formula funds and block grants, which support state and 
			local law enforcement agencies throughout Illinois.  "The operational impact of raising the age for approximately 
			4,000 17-year-olds arrested for felony offenses will not crash the 
			system," according to the commission report. "In fact, most 
			practitioners interviewed for this report believe the change will 
			relieve some administrative burdens inherent in a ‘bifurcated 
			system' in which some 17-year-olds are handled as adults and others 
			are considered juveniles." The commission's full report is available at
			http://ijjc.illinois.gov/rta.
			 
            [Text from
			
			Illinois Juvenile Justice 
			Commission file received from the
			
			Illinois Office of Communication and Information] 
             |