|  Among those items was a discussion on the progress made thus far on 
			establishing a TIF district for the downtown portion of the city. 
			City administrator Sue McLaughlin told the council that the TIF 
			review committee -- which consists of council members Kathy Horn, 
			Tom O'Donohue, Bruce Carmitchel, Mayor Keith Snyder and herself 
			-- had reviewed a set of policies she had put together for 
			administering the TIF. McLaughlin said she had put the document together for the city of 
			Lincoln by reviewing policy documents from cities such as 
			Jacksonville, Bloomington, Springfield and a couple of other 
			communities in the southern part of the state. She had taken what 
			she felt were the best portions of those policies and tweaked them 
			into a workable document for Lincoln. She said the committee had reviewed and tweaked the document, and 
			it had also been reviewed by John Myers, who is the city's TIF 
			consultant. McLaughlin told the council that within the policy there were 
			still two specific areas that were not settled, and those would end 
			up being the focus of the council's discussion. 
			 The first issue was whether or not to include roofs as allowable 
			repairs or restorations in the TIF program. TIF, or tax increment financing, is a program that serves 
			multiple purposes. First, it provides money to downtown businesses 
			and developers so they can make improvements on their buildings. 
			These projects for existing buildings generally involve making 
			façade improvements that enhance the look of the building and the 
			overall aesthetic of the downtown area. When the work is done, the end goal is to raise the assessed 
			value of the building on the tax rolls. The city then benefits in 
			that it gets to claim for its coffers the difference between the 
			former tax assessment and the new tax assessment. The city can then 
			use this money in a variety of ways, including offering it to other 
			businesses for their improvements or using it to make general 
			improvements to the downtown area, such as those included 
			in the downtown revitalization program. Roofs came into question for the committee because this type of 
			work does not normally increase the assessed value of a property. 
			However, this is also something that is needed by many of the 
			downtown businesses. McLaughlin said that as the committee discussed this, a 
			suggestion from the mayor was that perhaps the city could allow 
			roofs for multiple businesses if it represented a significant 
			savings for them to work together and have roof work done all at 
			once.  After McLaughlin outlined this, Snyder asked if the council had 
			any thoughts. O'Donohue said he felt it was a mixed bag. He said he realized 
			that many cities don't allow roofs in their TIF, but he sees there 
			is a need in Lincoln for roof repair on many of the buildings. He 
			told the council that it just comes down to the question, "Do you 
			want to do roofs?" 
			 David Wilmert commented that he believed it would be hard to get 
			new investors in the area if the roof was in need of repair but that 
			was not 
			allowed in the TIF program. He indicated it could be a hindrance 
			to getting investors in the downtown area. 
			[to top of second column] | 
 
			Melody Anderson offered a suggestion that perhaps a roof could be 
			included if a façade improvement is also involved. She said 
			the first priority could be the façade, but if the roof needed to be 
			repaired at the same time, then that could be included as well. Anderson said she would be more in favor of building some 
			flexibility into the policy over just saying "absolutely not" to 
			roofs. Snyder also commented that there was some flexibility for 
			developers, and some of the standard policies could be set aside as 
			needed. Jonie Tibbs said she felt there will need to be a lot of 
			case-by-case decisions, especially as the TIF is getting started. 
			She said that with the program being new for the city, the council 
			would be learning along the way. McLaughlin said she would take what the council had to say and 
			incorporate it into the policy. The second portion of the policy that was left undecided was 
			whether or not a loan program would be incorporated into the TIF, or 
			if money would be distributed through grants. McLaughlin said that much of the time, businesses in a TIF are not 
			looking for a loan they have to pay back; they are looking for a 
			grant. She said in her research she saw only one or two communities that 
			have a loan program; the rest use grants. Anderson asked if the loan option could be left out now but added 
			later if the council felt there was a need for it, and McLaughlin 
			said it could. McLaughlin also asked the council if they were ready to approve 
			the TIF policy document. She said the final step then would be to 
			finish up the work on a TIF application. She said the application 
			would be drafted according to the policies the council adopts. 
			 At Anderson's urging it was agreed that the policy document, with 
			the changes outlined during the workshop discussions, will go on 
			next week's voting agenda, bringing the city one step closer to 
			implementing the TIF program. It was also noted by McLaughlin early in the discussion that the 
			policies have been written to give the council an "out" on any 
			project. She said a review committee will take the applications, but 
			the final say on whether or not to fund a project will come from the 
			council, not the committee. Snyder also told the council that he knows of at least one 
			project that is ready and waiting for the TIF money to become 
			available, but he offered no other details on that subject. 
			[By NILA SMITH] 
			
			Past related articles   |