|  The study, commissioned by seven Midwestern state Farm Bureaus, 
				was conducted by Decision Innovation Solutions of Urbandale, 
				Iowa. The analysis used a variety of analytical techniques and 
				tools. Data sets for the years 2007 through 2012 served as the 
				point of reference. The primary purposes of the study were 
				twofold: (1) to estimate the degree to which land use changes 
				have occurred in the states; and (2) to identify potential 
				factors contributing to land use changes. Notable conclusions of the study 
				include the following: 
					
					Since 2007, 
					only 3 percent of the total land area in the seven-state 
					study area shifted away from grassy habitat. 
					There was a 
					net move toward grassy habitat from nonagricultural land.
					
					Even as 
					economic returns from crop production outpaced those from 
					conservation programs, large net shifts of land toward crop 
					production did not uniformly occur throughout the study 
					area. 
					The research does not support the 
					notion that crop insurance subsides and net returns alone 
					are the dominant factors contributing to loss of grassy 
					habitat, especially when observed from a regional 
					perspective.  
				
				 Other conclusions include the 
				following: 
					
					To base policy 
					decisions solely upon results from the USDA's Cropland Data 
					Layer data sets can lead to less-than-optimal outcomes with 
					regard to land use patterns, especially when using earlier 
					data sets. 
					The study of 
					land use change is a complex issue that cannot be reduced to 
					a few variables. 
					Land use 
					across the seven Midwestern states studied is very diverse, 
					with USDA using more than 130 categories to classify land 
					use in its annual data layer. 
					Land use 
					continues to evolve in the Midwest, just as it has for 
					centuries. New crops emerge and others fade away as market 
					demand changes over time. 
					Results from 
					this study confirm that land use changes reflect a wide 
					range of changes in land uses. 
					The Conservation Reserve Program 
					continues to perform as intended, which is to provide for 
					flexibility in total U.S. acreage devoted to the production 
					of food, fiber and fuel, while protecting more ecologically 
					sensitive land.  
              
				[to top of second column] | 
 
			"Land use is a complex matter," said Dave Miller, director of 
			research and commodity services at the Iowa Farm Bureau Federation. 
			"To fairly assess what and why changes are happening with a limited 
			resource like land, you have to examine it in the right context. "Our state Farm Bureaus felt that to adequately address land use 
			challenges, we needed to understand what was happening and why," 
			Miller said. "A complete analysis that studied changes both to and 
			from wildlife habitat had not been done, and this was the impetus 
			behind our multistate study." Other land use studies have focused on the extent to which land 
			is being converted to crop production, or more specifically, to 
			federal farm program crops or to crops covered by crop insurance. 
			Such studies lack the context and analysis to properly measure the 
			impact of other factors on land use. Factors like water 
			availability, net returns to crop production, conservation program 
			changes, land values and alternative opportunities for the land all 
			affect land use decisions. "We are pleased with the ability of the results to convey a more 
			complete picture on this important topic. By working with several 
			Midwestern states, we have a much better understanding of the nature 
			of land use change in this key U.S. region," said Spencer Parkinson, 
			executive director of Decision Innovation Solutions.  "No one is more interested in knowing and understanding the 
			reasons behind land use trends than the American farmer," said 
			Philip Nelson, president of the Illinois Farm Bureau. "The analysis 
			shows that just as it has for centuries, land use continues to 
			evolve and is not just the result of farm policy or farm risk 
			management tools." 
              
              [Text from file received from
				Illinois Farm Bureau]
			Decision Innovation Solutions is an Iowa-based economic research 
			firm dedicated to giving agribusiness decision-makers the tools and 
			information needed to chart their own direction. DIS team members 
			use their production and agribusiness experience and insight, 
			coupled with proprietary analysis tools, to help clients ask better 
			questions, receive better answers and make better decisions. The Illinois Farm Bureau is a member of the American Farm Bureau 
			Federation, a national organization of farmers and ranchers. Founded 
			in 1916, IFB is a nonprofit, membership organization directed by 
			farmers who join through their county Farm Bureau. IFB has a total 
			membership of more than 400,000, a voting membership of more than 
			82,000 and represents 3 out of 4 Illinois farmers. 
			
			 |