| 
			 Some questions and answers about what's afoot and who's affected: 
 			Q: What's the nub of the change, and why is President Barack Obama 
			changing course at this late date?
 			A: The president is letting insurance companies offer people another 
			year of coverage under their existing plans even if those plans 
			don't meet the requirements set out in his health care overhaul law. 
			He's doing so because of mounting frustration — even anger — over 
			the millions of cancellation notices that have been going out to 
			Americans whose plans don't measure up to the law's coverage 
			standards.
 			Q: Problem solved?
 			A: Not so fast. Obama's so-called fix doesn't force insurance 
			companies to do anything. It just gives them the option of extending 
			old plans for existing customers in the individual market, and only 
			if state insurance commissioners also give their OK. 			
			
			 
 			Q: Sounds like a no-brainer. Why wouldn't insurance companies let 
			people re-up?
 			A: The companies aren't happy about being thrown a curve ball after 
			they've already firmed up 2014 rates and plans. It will take a while 
			to see how many of them agree to reinstate old plans for another 
			year — and at what price.
 			Q: What's the early word?
 			A: Most companies and state insurance commissioners say they need 
			time to study the changes before making a commitment. Aetna Inc., 
			the nation's third largest health insurer, said it plans to extend 
			some of its canceled policies. Washington state's insurance 
			commissioner said he won't allow insurance companies there to extend 
			the old policies. He said people can get better coverage on the new 
			health care exchange.
 			Q: Why not force insurance companies to extend those old policies, 
			not just give them that option?
 			A: That's a more radical step. Some Democrats want that to happen 
			but it almost certainly would require legislation from Congress — 
			not just a presidential decision — and Republicans would object to 
			such a stiff new requirement on the insurance industry. More steps 
			may be required, though, to restore coverage for people losing it.
 			Q: The changes mainly affect the 5 percent of people who get their 
			own insurance policies through the individual market. What's the big 
			deal?
 			A: In a country of more than 300 million people, 5 percent is a big 
			number. Roughly 14 million people buy their own policies, and many 
			of those plans are not just junk insurance, contrary to what White 
			House officials suggest. Already, more than 4 million people have 
			gotten cancellation notices. And some small businesses are losing 
			coverage for their workers too.
 			Plus, if the government can't get its HealthCare.gov website running 
			better by Dec. 15, some people who got cancellations run the risk of 
			having a break in coverage. The health care law was supposed to 
			reduce the number of uninsured people, not increase it.
 			Q: So people who successfully make the switch to the new insurance 
			marketplaces can rest easy?
 			A: Not really. If lots of healthy people who get cheaper insurance 
			through the individual market end up keeping that coverage instead 
			of switching to the more robust plans offered through "Obamacare," 
			that could weaken the financial footing of plans offered by the 
			insurance marketplaces.
 			
            [to top of second column] | 
            
			 			Q: How so?
 			A: People with current plans are a known risk to insurers. At some 
			point, they all had to pass the stiff medical screening that the law 
			forbids starting next year. Insurers were counting on premiums from 
			those with current individual plans to help balance out the cost of 
			care for people who have been shut out of the system, and who 
			represent a potentially high risk. To the extent that healthier 
			people stay out of the new insurance pool being created under the 
			law, that would raise costs.
 
			Q: What would happen then?
 			A: You guessed it: higher rates, potentially. Premiums for 2014 are 
			set; where the increases would show up is in premiums for 2015. In a 
			letter to state insurance commissioners Thursday, the Obama 
			administration referred to the risk of "unanticipated changes in 
			premium revenue." It promised to provide assistance through other 
			provisions of the health care law.
 			Q: I get my insurance through my job. Sounds like I don't need to 
			worry.
 			A: The vast majority of people with employer-based plans shouldn't 
			be affected by the changes announced by Obama.
 			Q: The health care law was signed into law in 2010. Why is this 
			issue coming up at the last minute?
 			A: The Obama administration miscalculated — big time — how many 
			people would lose coverage in the transition to the new health 
			insurance marketplace. It specified that people who had plans before 
			the law took effect could hang on to those plans. But it didn't 
			anticipate the big wave of cancellations among people who had plans 
			that changed after the law took effect or who bought new plans after 
			the law kicked in. 			
			
			 
 			Q: The president says "this fix" won't solve every problem and that 
			doing more will require working with Congress. What else needs to be 
			done? And is there any hope of Obama and the Congress agreeing on 
			changes?
 			A: Before Washington became so politically polarized, major 
			legislation was usually followed within a year or two by a 
			"technical corrections" bill that addressed inevitable unintended 
			consequences and shortcomings. A bill as massive as the Affordable 
			Care Act has many such issues, which the administration has tried to 
			address through regulations, "guidance" and other administrative 
			steps. For example, the White House last summer delayed the law's 
			employer coverage requirement by one year to allow more time to work 
			out regulatory issues.
 			Obama seems to be yearning for a return to earlier days, but 
			Republicans are so adamant in opposing the health care law that it 
			seems far from likely.
 [Associated 
					Press; NANCY BENAC, Associated Press] Associated Press writer 
			Ricardo Alonso-Zaldivar contributed to this report. Follow Benac on Twitter 
			at http://twitter.com/nbenac.
			 Copyright 2013 The Associated 
			Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, 
			broadcast, rewritten or redistributed. |