| 
			 It's a little-known twist of nature — your lungs can live on for a 
			while after you die. The air left inside keeps them from 
			deteriorating right away as other organs do. 
 			An innovative experiment now aims to use that hour-or-more window of 
			time to boost lung transplants by allowing donations from people who 
			suddenly collapse and die at home instead of in a hospital.
 			"There aren't enough lungs. We're burying them," said Dr. Thomas 
			Egan of the University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, who is 
			leading the project. "It turns out your lungs don't die when you 
			do."
 			This is a new frontier for transplants.
 			Today, registered organ donors don't get to fulfill that last wish 
			if they die outside of a hospital. The U.S. doesn't have a system to 
			recover their organs quickly enough. It can be an added shock to 
			grieving families, and a waste of potentially good organs that might 
			ease transplant shortages.
 			"The general public does not understand how hard it is to become an 
			organ donor. They assume if they sign their card, when they die, 
			then it will happen," said bioethicist Arthur Caplan of New York 
			University's Langone Medical Center. "Only 2 to 3 percent of people 
			die in circumstances that let them be organ donors." 
			 
 The new study in the Research Triangle area of North Carolina is 
			trying to change that, focusing on lungs because Egan's research 
			suggests they last the longest.
 			Here's how it works.
 			Someone collapses with cardiac arrest. Emergency workers exhaust 
			attempts at CPR. If the driver's license lists the person as a 
			registered donor, the local organ recovery agency tracks down 
			next-of-kin for permission to participate in the research.
 			If that happens within about an hour of death, then workers pump a 
			little air into the lungs to preserve them while the body is 
			transported to an operating room for organ recovery.
 			Workers wheeled a cooler bearing the first set of lungs donated in 
			the experiment into Egan's lab for the next crucial step — 
			determining if they're really healthy.
 			Inside the science fiction-looking domed machine, a ventilator 
			slowly filled the lungs. They resembled a turkey awaiting roasting. 
			Some black speckles on the outside didn't worry Egan. They're a sign 
			of city living, or maybe earlier smoking. It's deeper inside that 
			counts.
 			Egan infused them with a special fluid that flows like blood 
			normally would. This so-called ex vivo lung perfusion preserves the 
			lungs even longer. It can tell if they transfer oxygen properly or 
			help spot signs of disease. Egan also peeked inside with a 
			bronchoscope, looking for abnormalities.
 			These lungs didn't pass the test because Egan found some early 
			disease. But they did show it was possible to get a donation in time 
			to try.
 			Lungs that do pass will be transplanted into patients willing to 
			take a chance on these nontraditional organs, as part of the study 
			funded by the National Institutes of Health.
 			"That would be the greatest thing, to be able to breathe normal," 
			said Lisa Bowman, 51, of Union Grove, N.C.
 			Bowman has been on the waiting list for new lungs for two years 
			after a rare genetic disease gradually damaged her own until, she 
			says, it became like "breathing through a pinhole." She hopes Egan's 
			research will help her find a match more quickly. 
			 
			Some previous U.S. attempts at out-of-hospital donation of another 
			organ, kidneys, didn't pan out because of logistical hurdles. But 
			transplant specialists are watching this newest experiment closely, 
			saying that if it works, it eventually could open the way to many 
			more donations — not just lungs but maybe other organs, too.
 			"We've had a number of very disgruntled family members that wanted 
			to donate (a loved one's organs) and weren't able to," said Dr. 
			Jeffrey Punch, transplant surgery chief at the University of 
			Michigan. Spurred by that family reaction, in a few months, his team 
			plans to try recovering kidneys from cardiac arrest victims who are 
			rushed to the emergency room but can't be saved and turn out to be 
			registered donors.
 			In North Carolina, Egan's study likewise will try to recover lungs 
			from people who die in the ER as well as in the community.
 			Today, the vast majority of donated organs come from people who 
			suffer a severe injury and are hooked to a ventilator for days, even 
			weeks, until doctors determine they are brain-dead. Machinery keeps 
			blood and oxygen flowing until surgeons can collect organs deemed 
			healthy enough.
 			What about registered donors who collapse with cardiac arrest at 
			home, the office or the gym — and efforts at CPR fail? Experience 
			overseas shows it's possible to take quick steps to preserve and 
			recover their organs. Doctors in Spain have transplanted kidneys, 
			livers and lungs from these unconventional donors. France has 
			reported some success with kidneys.
 			
            [to top of second column] | 
            
			 
			In the United States, more than 6,000 people died last year while 
			awaiting one of those organs. 
			Lungs are in particularly short supply. Only 15 percent to 20 
			percent of donated lungs are usable, often because complications 
			during the donor's hospitalization damaged them. Just 1,700 lungs 
			transplants are performed each year, compared with nearly 11,000 
			kidney transplants from deceased donors.
 			Egan, a cardiothoracic surgeon, said doctors don't even suggest the 
			possibility of a lung transplant to thousands who might benefit 
			because there aren't enough donors.
 			Yet the Institute of Medicine has estimated that as many as 22,000 
			people a year who die outside of hospitals could be potential organ 
			donors if scientists settle some ethical and practical questions.
 			Buying time to recover those organs means doing some things not 
			normally done to dead bodies, noted bioethicist Caplan, and that can 
			mean ventilating lungs or filtering blood to the kidneys.
 			How will grieving families react? Is it possible to tell who's a 
			registered donor, and find next-of-kin, in time to try?
 			New York City studied kidney donations after at-home deaths in 2011.
 			Dr. Stephen Wall of Bellevue Hospital Center said community and 
			religious groups met with researchers and were interested. But study 
			rules restricted which deaths were eligible, and researchers had 
			just 20 minutes to get initial family permission. In six months, 
			nine deaths were considered but didn't qualify, often because the 
			deceased hadn't previously registered as an organ donor, Wall said. 
			New York is among states with low donor registration rates.
 			Wall's team is considering trying again with lungs, because of the 
			longer time window.
 			Lung cells don't depend on blood flow for oxygen, Egan explained. 
			When the heart stops beating, they use what oxygen is left in the 
			air sacs and airways.
 			For how long? In a series of experiments with animals, Egan showed 
			lungs stay viable for an hour, or four hours if they are ventilated, 
			before they're cooled to await transplant. 
			
			 
 			That ventilation is one key to the $4 million, three-year study, 
			because when emergency workers exhaust attempts at CPR and declare 
			someone dead, they typically leave behind the breathing tube 
			inserted in the person's throat. That makes it simple to restart 
			ventilation to preserve the lungs, Egan said.
 			"If we can get the lungs ventilated within an hour, and then removed 
			within an hour or two and cooled, we think they'll work just fine," 
			he said.
 			Kidneys don't have as long a survival window. But in Michigan, Punch 
			has a similar preservation plan: Insert a few tubes near the kidneys 
			to filter blood to them until they're recovered.
 			Fast retrieval isn't the only issue. Surgeons don't know if 
			nontraditional organs work as well, cautioned Dr. Bryan Meyers of 
			Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis.
 			Chest X-rays and other in-hospital donor testing determine the 
			quality of today's traditionally donated lungs.
 			"This trial is very timely and very pertinent," Meyers said, to see 
			if testing in that domed machine could substitute for that hospital 
			track record.
 			Egan notes that lung disease is the nation's third-leading killer. 
			He says the untapped pool of potential donors who die outside of the 
			hospital could expand transplants significantly.
 			"There are huge logistical hurdles," he said. "But if we're right, 
			this would have a profound impact on the number of lungs that are 
			available for transplant." [Associated 
					Press; LAURAN NEERGAARD, AP Medical Writer] AP National Writer Allen 
			G. Breed in Chapel Hill, N.C., contributed to this report. Copyright 2013 The Associated 
			Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, 
			broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
 
			
			
			 |