| 
			 The justices said they will take up an issue that has divided the 
			lower courts in the face of roughly 40 lawsuits from for-profit 
			companies asking to be spared from having to cover some or all forms 
			of contraception. 
 			The Obama administration promotes the law's provision of a range of 
			preventive care, free of charge, as a key benefit of the health care 
			overhaul. Contraception is included in the package of cost-free 
			benefits, which opponents say is an attack on the religious freedom 
			of employers.
 			The court will consider two cases. One involves Hobby Lobby Inc., an 
			Oklahoma City-based arts and crafts chain with 13,000 full-time 
			employees. Hobby Lobby won in the lower courts.
 			The other case is an appeal from Conestoga Wood Specialties Corp., a 
			Pennsylvania company that employs 950 people in making wood 
			cabinets. Lower courts rejected the company's claims.
 			The court said the cases will be combined for arguments, probably in 
			late March. A decision should come by late June. 			
			
			 
 			The cases center on the provision of the law that requires most 
			employers that offer health insurance to their workers to provide 
			the range of preventive health benefits. In both instances, the 
			Christian families that own the companies say that insuring some 
			forms of contraception violates their religious beliefs.
 			The key issue is whether profit-making corporations may assert 
			religious beliefs under the 1993 Religious Freedom Restoration Act 
			or the First Amendment provision guaranteeing Americans the right to 
			believe and worship as they choose.
 			Nearly four years ago, the justices expanded the concept of 
			corporate "personhood," saying in the Citizens United case that 
			corporations have the right to participate in the political process 
			the same way that individuals do. Some lower court judges have 
			applied the same logic in the context of religious beliefs.
 			"The government has no business forcing citizens to choose between 
			making a living and living free," said David Cortman of the Alliance 
			Defending Freedom, the Christian public interest law firm that is 
			representing Conestoga Wood at the Supreme Court.
 			White House press secretary Jay Carney said the health care law 
			"puts women and families in control of their health care by covering 
			vital preventive care, like cancer screenings and birth control, 
			free of charge." Carney said the administration already has exempted 
			churches from the requirement, and has created a buffer between 
			faith-affiliated charities and contraceptive coverage by requiring 
			insurers or another third party to provide contraceptive coverage 
			instead of the religious employer. Separate lawsuits are challenging 
			that arrangement.
 			The issue is largely confined to religious institutions and 
			family-controlled businesses with a small number of shareholders. A 
			survey by the Kaiser Family Foundation found 85 percent of large 
			American employers already had offered coverage before the health 
			care law required it. 			
			
			 
 			Hobby Lobby calls itself a "biblically founded business" and is 
			closed on Sundays. Founded in 1972, the company now operates more 
			than 500 stores in 41 states. The Green family, Hobby Lobby's 
			owners, also owns the Mardel Christian bookstore chain.
 			The 10th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals said corporations can be 
			protected by the 1993 law in the same manner as individuals, and 
			"that the contraceptive-coverage requirement substantially burdens 
			Hobby Lobby and Mardel's rights under" the law.
 			
            [to top of second column] | 
            
			 
			In its Supreme Court brief, the administration said the appeals 
			court ruling was wrong and, if allowed to stand, would make the law 
			"a sword used to deny employees of for-profit commercial enterprises 
			the benefits and protections of generally applicable laws."
 			Conestoga Wood is owned by a Mennonite family who "object as a 
			matter of conscience to facilitating contraception that may prevent 
			the implantation of a human embryo in the womb."
 			The 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled against the company on 
			its claims under the 1993 law and the Constitution, saying 
			"for-profit, secular corporations cannot engage in religious 
			exercise."
 			The Supreme Court will have to confront several questions: Can these 
			businesses hold religious beliefs; does the health care provision 
			significantly infringe on those beliefs and, even if the answer to 
			the first two questions is "yes," does the government still have a 
			sufficient interest in guaranteeing women who work for the companies 
			access to contraception?
 			The justices chose two cases in which the companies object to only a 
			few of the 20 forms of contraception approved by the Food and Drug 
			Administration. In a third case in which the court took no action 
			Tuesday, Michigan-based Autocam Corp. doesn't want to pay for any 
			contraception for its employees because of its owners' Roman 
			Catholic beliefs.
 			The emergency contraceptives Plan B and Ella work mostly by 
			preventing ovulation. The FDA says on its website that Plan B "may 
			also work by preventing fertilization of an egg ... or by preventing 
			attachment (implantation) to the womb (uterus)," while Ella also may 
			work by changing the lining of the uterus so as to prevent 
			implantation. 			
			
			 
 			Hobby Lobby specifically argues that two intrauterine devices (IUDs) 
			also may prevent implantation of a fertilized egg. The company's 
			owners say they believe life begins at conception, and they oppose 
			only birth control methods that can prevent implantation of a 
			fertilized egg in the uterus, but not other forms of contraception.
 			In siding with the administration, several women's groups rejected 
			what they see as efforts by the businesses to come between women and 
			their doctors.
 			The health care law's inclusion of contraception among preventive 
			health benefits was a major victory in a decades-long fight for 
			equal coverage for women's reproductive health care needs, said 
			Marcia Greenberger, co-president of the National Women's Law Center.
 			Citing the example of IUDs, Greenberger said the devices may be the 
			safest, most effective way to prevent pregnancy for women who cannot 
			take the birth control pill. But at $500 to $1,000 for an IUD, "the 
			cost can be prohibitive," she said. [Associated 
					Press; MARK SHERMAN] Copyright 2013 The Associated 
			Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, 
			broadcast, rewritten or redistributed. 
			
			
			 |