|  The first reason is that because of continuous rains in the 
				spring, beans and corn were planted very late, some as late as 
				May 15 (significant because that was the plant date for corn 
				back when it was grandpa's farm). 
				Late planting pushes back the harvest date. The second reason 
				that such large contingents of the crops are still in the field 
				is that the corn crop is coming in very wet, with harvested 
				moisture above 20, and producers are taking this extra bit of 
				time before the first major frost to dry the corn down in the 
				field. Corn with lower moisture levels presented at the elevator 
				means the producer will pay less for expensive drying processes. 
				 And the third reason the crops are still in the field is that 
				the prices for corn and beans right now are lower than desired, 
				and lower than they have historically been for the last couple 
				of years, and the size of the bean crop is variably less than 
				hoped for. Since prices are low and the size of each bean is 
				less than desired, why hurry to get it to market. The corn crop across the nation is good to excellent, 
				translating into lower prices for all the producers. Together 
				with higher input prices, this means that the producer will have 
				a much lower net profit per acre since 2007. Added costs at the 
				point of sale, such as higher drying costs and the cost of 
				testing for quality issues such as aflatoxin, further erode the 
				profit per acre (see the introduction by John Fulton). The only hedge farmers have against lower immediate prices at 
				harvest is to either put a portion of their crop in on-farm 
				storage at an additional expense, or put a portion into storage 
				at the elevator -- again, an added expense. 
				 2011 was the great change year for the price of corn. The 
				average sale price for corn prior to 2011 fell short of the $4 
				mark, with 2010 averaging $3.83. The average price in 2011 
				jumped to $6.01 nationally, and higher regionally, an increase 
				of almost 64 percent. Perhaps this jump in prices was due to the 
				optimism of increasing local markets for corn with the expansion 
				of ethanol production and the federal stimulus for ethanol 
				production. This jump in prices continued in 2012 to an average 
				of $6.67 due to the drought-related shortfall of the Midwestern 
				crop.  One of the possible dilemmas for producers is related to the 
				development of drought-tolerant corn. Drought-tolerant corn is 
				the result of selecting varieties of seed that showed better 
				characteristics of performance, particularly valuable during 
				drought conditions.  Then the expected glut of corn in 2013 and the failed 
				expansion of local markets pushed average pricing back down 
				below the 2011 mark. Any increase in cost and decrease in price shrinks the 
				on-farm profit and the amount of money available in farming 
				regions for ag-related products. Drought conditions in both 2012 and 2013 should have dried 
				corn down to lower moisture levels by the expected harvest 
				dates, but in both years, producers found that their test 
				harvests brought in corn with moisture levels much higher than 
				expected.  This year's initial spot tests in the third week in September 
				brought in corn testing at 23 percent, a level that was rejected 
				at some elevators, causing the corn harvest to be pushed back.
				 Since the killer frost has not yet hit in earnest in Logan 
				County, producers put the corn harvest on hold to allow for 
				further drying and instead began to harvest beans. The soybean 
				crop was variable since the rains crucial to bean production 
				during the last two weeks of production were almost nonexistent. 
				Beans began to dry earlier than expected in the fields, and the 
				size of the crop was less than hoped for in many areas. Corn harvested three weeks later, in the middle of October, 
			showed that the crop had dried down only about 2 percent, to 21. 
			Killer frosts continue to be delayed (a killer frost prevents the 
			further drying of corn in the fields because the tissues in the corn 
			plant for moving moisture are damaged or destroyed), and strips of 
			corn in the fields continue to stay green. 
              
				[to top of second column] 
              
				
  | 
 A possible explanation for this apparent failure to dry in the 
			fields is that the very same characteristics that make 
			drought-tolerant corn excellent during drought years also cause the 
			plant and, more important, the kernels to hold on to moisture and 
			dry more slowly. The result is added cost to dry the harvested corn. Altogether, higher input costs and lower sale prices translate to 
			lower profits per acre for the producer.  A contingent of Logan County farmers got together in 2005 in an 
			attempt to increase the local market for corn with the development 
			of an ethanol plant in the county. A local ethanol production 
			facility would give local producers another outlet for their corn 
			crop and would likely increase the profit margin for participating 
			farmers. This valiant effort to increase profits came to a 
			screeching halt late in 2011, mostly due to the protests by Logan 
			County residents who resisted locating the ethanol plant in their 
			"backyards," followed by the shrinking federal ethanol subsidy, 
			making the success of the ethanol production facility doubtful. 
			 This failure to locate a local competing outlet for the corn crop 
			left Logan County producers at the mercy of the Chicago market and 
			large-scale buyers, ADM and Cargill. Input costs are likely to continue to climb as new challenges are 
			presented to producers. Production will follow the weather and 
			climate trends, sometimes making Logan County producers the winners 
			in the competition to grow a larger-than-usual crop when producers 
			in other regions fall below their norm, and sometimes making Logan 
			County producers the losers in the production competition. Costs at 
			the point of sale will likely continue to rise as new legislation 
			calls for more testing for safety and further restricts the sale of 
			damaged corn. These and other challenges have made the selling price and costs 
			to market a game changer. 
				
				 Perhaps the most adequate answer is another attempt to develop 
			more diverse and local markets for corn and beans, or diversify the 
			crop with specialty food crops to local markets.  Either way, being a producer today is a very challenging job. 
              
[By JIM YOUNGQUIST] 
              
 
 |